W. B. Yeats: The Lover Tells Of The Rose In His Heart
[Image source: National Portrait Gallery]
THE LOVER TELLS OF THE ROSE IN HIS HEART
All things uncomely and broken, all things worn
out and old,
The cry of a child by the roadway, the creak of a
lumbering cart,
The heavy steps of the ploughman, splashing the
wintry mould,
Are wronging your image that blossoms a rose in the
deeps of my heart.
The wrong of unshapely things is a wrong too great
to be told;
I hunger to build them anew and sit on a green knoll
apart,
With the earth and the sky and the water, re-made,
like a casket of gold
For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in
the deeps of my heart.
(from
The Wind Among the Reeds, 1899)
All the lines are enriched alexandrines (that is to say with
extra unstressed syllables), but the first three are a specific music because
of the strong medial breaks visually indicated by commas. They more or less
split, amoeba-like, into restless trimeters.
This will be the most spirited part of the poem for many
readers, with many detonations. In particular, setting “The cry of the child”
directly after the word “old” is a wonderfully intelligent piece of concision –
it tells us everything about how we are to hear this cry (in stark contrast to
what it might connote): hopeless, hungry, and trapped in the cold years. But
after all, the first three lines are only an introduction; we don’t know where
this is going yet.
The fourth line has a quite different music. It flows from
end to end, maximizing the enrichment (six accents but eighteen syllables). But
though the auditory image of a rippling, unimpeded stream is certainly present,
there can be no doubt that the climax of the line is “a rose”, which emerges
with quiet definition at the point where, because of the preceding lines, we
have learnt to expect a pause. I suppose it does not need spelling out that “a
rose” blossoms in mid-line as in “the deeps of my heart”. [It is odd how this
last phrase marries “the creak of a lumbering cart”, denying the opposition
between them. This offers a subsidiary hint at re-integrating the lover into
his surroundings and accepting the “wronging” as a natural event]
The rose in European poetry since the troubadours is a
symbol that has drifted a long way from its floral source. I suppose you
assume, as I do, that this rose is red, but this idea leads not towards
horticulture but towards an idealized image incorporating other complex
enclosures; hearts, vaginas and heavens. It’s an image that blends the desired
with the desire, so you may say that here the rose means what the lover is
experiencing, which is created at least as much by himself as by the person he
is addressing. It is what he is dreaming about; but it is also his dream.
We are now clear about the relation between the opening
lines and the rose of the title; they “wrong” it. Do they wrong the lover or
his beloved? Is he really a victim, a nurturer, or both at the same time, or in
fact neither? What is certain is that the rose is now associated with weakness,
and if we feel that it might be less self-regarding to address the weakness of
the child’s ignorant wailing and the ploughman’s grinding poverty, rather than
feeling annoyed by them, we may not have much sympathy with the lover’s
torments.
This reflection keeps coming back as we pick our way though
the second stanza, which repeats the rhyme-sounds of the first stanza but
without its force. A wrong “too great to
be told” feels like an inadequate expression, and the potential energy of
“build” – qualified as it already is by being only a hunger to build – is
further undermined by “sit” and “apart”.
But these indications of feebleness do lead to a subtly
surprising outcome. When the last line comes round again, it now appears
against a different background, and gains a certain paradoxical strength. If
the rose seemed a bit pallid at the end of Stanza 1, it seems to glow at the
end of Stanza 2. You might express the effect in these words: Nonetheless,
it still blossoms. Perhaps all the more perfectly in adversity.
As it might be: someone who feels their belief (opinion,
philosophy, religion, love) slighted and collapsing continues to assert: Nevertheless,
there is something in it .... there are many things we don’t understand ....
somewhere, there is a happy land ... so that it is on the verge of ceasing
to be a belief and remains only as a dream; then the persistence of the dream
and the fact of the past belief provide a sort of testimony (at least in one’s
own mind) that underwrites the long-desired Maybe. Yeats would later
write of “the foul rag-and-bone shop of the heart”, but in those very words
would cling on to the sentimental romanticism of earlier days. Maybe it
had after all hidden the key to transforming the world, though he had not found
it.
Labels: W.B. Yeats
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home