Along the line of smoky hills / The crimson forest stands,
The Arcturus model was (is?) inexpensive books reaching an unpretentious audience via its enviable distribution to gift shops, service stations, outlets like The Works, and so on. There's something pleasing about seeing a front cover so unadorned with inducements to purchase. Arcturus books are never reviewed, they aren't for the kind of audience that cares about reviews. You might say they bear a similar relation to literary books as "novelette" does to "novel": it connotes a type of book you know exists but never read yourself. Anyway, that was the message I felt I defied, doggedly reading through the 600 pages of Best-Loved Poems.
Maybe (I fancied) this substantial volume mainly caught the eye of hasty gift-buyers who suddenly thought they remembered that auntie Jim or uncle Pat liked a bit of poetry. But my fancy is fairly obtuse on this topic. Despite its unassuming appearance, this was evidently a publication with eyes to markets right across the globe, readerships that I probably know nothing about.
Obviously what is not like a novelette is that Best-Loved Poems contains a fair amount of the greatest literature you could ever aspire to read: Shakespeare or Blake or Marvell or Donne or Wordsworth or Keats or Dickinson or Whitman (all with plenty of poems here) blaze out thrillingly as I read through it. The effect is enhanced because their poems are all mixed in with the others. The anthology is organized by topics like "Irreverence and Satire" or "Nature and the Seasons" and avoids chronology or grouping by author. Poems are presented here stripped of history and context: the emphasis is on their living and eternal core. Every poem has a title and is presented as a complete and single entity. There is no acknowledgement if a poem originally formed part of a larger structure (e.g. a Shakespeare sonnet, a Blake song of innocence or experience). There are no extracts, which means that poets who wrote their most characteristic work in larger forms are represented by untypical poems or not much at all (e.g. Spenser, Milton, Pope).
History is in a sense laid on one side. A cavalier lyric may sit next to Longfellow or Hardy or Edward Lear: it's here because it still says something now, not because of what it tells us about the 1640s. And after all that's one of the most important things about a poem.
Yet history washes back in various ways. This is, centrally, a nineteenth-century collection; there must be as many poems from that century as from all the others put together. A volume that truly reflected the best-loved poems of 2014 would no doubt contain many more twentieth-century poems, if only because of school curriculums. In this case the reason is simple: it was evidently a requirement of the publishers that all the contents must be in the public domain. From the 20th century's first three decades we have lots of Wilfred Owen and Hart Crane and Sara Teasdale and Katherine Mansfield and D.H. Lawrence, authors who died young, but no Yeats or Graves or Eliot or Joyce or Frost. (I must say I found this enforced selection quite illuminating.) So, among the well-loved poems about snow, there's no place for "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening". Nor for Robert Bridges' "London Snow". Bridges would have qualified by UK copyright laws (he died in 1930), but perhaps not by US laws -- or maybe the editor just forgot about him.
And though what was most intriguing and new to me was all the Canadian poems (the compiler, John Boyes, is from Montreal), there isn't anything here by Charles G.D. Roberts, presumably for the same reason (he died in 1943).
Given the centrality of the nineteenth century in the anthology, it's something of a paradox that it entirely excludes what many have considered the most characteristic form of Victorian poetry, the dramatic monologue. Browning is here as the author of "Prospice" and "Meeting at Night" and "Oh, to be in England", but there's no place for "My Last Duchess" or "Porphyria's Lover".
Linked to this, I think, are some other surprising exclusions. For instance, there's a distinct lack of narrative poetry: the only real stories are nonsense ones like the Jumblies and Jabberwocky. And there are no folk ballads (surely a well-loved kind of poem, you might think); though there is "La Belle Dame Sans Merci" and "The Lady of Shalott", two rather ballad-like poems that, now I come to think of it, are both notable for failing to tell much of a story. (What between the absence of narrative and the absence of folk ballads, there's no place here for that once well-loved poet Walter Scott.)
The well-loved poem, we understand, is one whose words we can make ours, a poem whose voice, if we think about it at all, can be reckoned the poet's own.
Maybe the presiding deities of this or any similar anthology, for me, are a bunch of authors that I only ever seem to read in anthologies, though always with a passing impulse to read more of them: Thomas Hood, Thomas Moore, William Cullen Bryant, the Rossettis, Poe, Lear, Hardy, and above all Burns.
An’ weary Winter comin fast,
An’ cozie here, beneath the blast,
Thou thought to dwell --
Till crash! the cruel coulter past
Out thro’ thy cell.
That wee-bit heap o’ leaves an’ stibble
Has cost thee mony a weary nibble!
Now thou’s turn’d out, for a’ thy trouble,
But house or hald,
To thole the winter’s sleety dribble,
An’ cranreuch cauld!
*
John Boyes edited several volumes published by Arcturus: Best-Loved Poems (2014) was preceded by Great Speeches: Words That Shaped The World (2009), Poems That Will Save Your Life (2010) and Poetry of the Civil War (2012). A note on Amazon says: "John Boyes has written for television, radio and several British, American and Canadian periodicals. His most recent titles are Character Parts, a study of characters in Canadian literature, and a children's book on Canada. He is the editor of six previous literary anthologies. A Montrealer, he lives with his wife and daughter in Vancouver."
*
I mentioned those Canadian poems. Here are some tiny samples, mostly from the section on "Nature and the Seasons".
Labels: L. M. Montgomery, Robert Burns, Walt Whitman
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home